The Presidents Club Scandal

We all know about the Presidents Club scandal and the moral outrage. I have some questions to ask.

What was a charity doing organising a rich man's stag party at the Dorchester Hotel which involved the deployment of young women as hostesses dressed in sexy clothes?

Why did the Dorchester Hotel allow such a party to be held on its premises?

Didn't any of these young ladies smell a rat when they were asked to wear sexy clothes, sign no-disclosure agreements and had their 'phones confiscated?

Did any of these ladies find it acceptable to be placed in a predicament where they would be groped by dirty old men? Did any of them volunteer for the job thinking that they would earn lots of money or further their careers?

The whole idea of escort agencies is rather seedy - were any of these ladies forced by traffickers or pimps to attend? Should there be a police investigation?

What are the share holders of the company directors who attended going to do about it?

What is the BBC going to do about it, if some of the people who appear on their shows also attended this stag night?

What are the constituents of any MP who attended going to do about it?

What will the wife of an attendee do about it?

Not every man who attended this seedy event is a dirty old man.

Probably, not every young woman who worked at the stag party is miss innocent. Some of these young women may feel it is their perfect right to ply their trade in any way they see fit; so who am I to judge.

In light of the  Hollywood sexual allegations against film directors: one thing is certain; the men who organised and attended this stag party should have had the foresight to realise that it would be infiltrated. An undercover journalist posed as a hostess and was prepared to be groped to expose this silly night out.

The stag party attendees have been exposed as either dirty old men or mugs or both.

Are these men, whose judgement is so poor, fit to be leaders of industry and other organisations?